Re: China Psychic Research Hard Scientific Data
From: Dr. Photon (brendan.roycroft_at_nmrc.ie)
Date: 02/25/05
- Next message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- Previous message: FrediFizzx: "Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge"
- In reply to: Q-on: "Re: China Psychic Research Hard Scientific Data"
- Next in thread: Q-on: "Re: China Psychic Research Hard Scientific Data"
- Reply: Q-on: "Re: China Psychic Research Hard Scientific Data"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 25 Feb 2005 13:57:33 -0800
"Q-on" <physicsofchi@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<1109131463.880052.113810@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>...
> Some common sense.
>
> What is the function of Qi that nothing else can be attributed to cause
> that
> same function?
>
> It's organization of distinct parts.
[snip]
Have you read up on Ilya Prigogine? He got the Nobel prize for
studying how order/organization arises.
You can get started at
http://nobelprize.org/chemistry/laureates/1977/prigogine-lecture.pdf
and there are many websites discussing the issues if you do a quick
search.
He starts off talking about thermodynamics, and goes on to prove how
order can arise from randomness. All you need is a power supply of the
ordinary kind (heat), no qi needed.
Subjectively, this can give the illusion that there is some guiding
force or organizational hidden element, but he actually showed
*mathematically* that you are *almost certain* to get organization
from randomness under various circumstances. He also did the
experiments, connected the experiments and theory, and ended up with
the Nobel for his efforts.
Creationists have been having a hard time with this for ages now, and
still think that order/evolution proves the existence of God or some
higher power. Prigogine showed how organization alone does not prove
this, and can be explained by normal means.
BR
- Next message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- Previous message: FrediFizzx: "Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge"
- In reply to: Q-on: "Re: China Psychic Research Hard Scientific Data"
- Next in thread: Q-on: "Re: China Psychic Research Hard Scientific Data"
- Reply: Q-on: "Re: China Psychic Research Hard Scientific Data"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]