Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)
From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 02/25/05
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Double-A: "Re: This is depressing news...Google wants to 'host' Wikipedia..."
- In reply to: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- Next in thread: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:26:19 -0500
examachine@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Of course I mean "demonstrating" that far is evident from the context.
I am in the habit of taking what other people say or write quite
literally. I expect to be taken at my word, so I accord that courtesy to
others.
Bob Kolker
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Double-A: "Re: This is depressing news...Google wants to 'host' Wikipedia..."
- In reply to: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- Next in thread: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
