Re: about phase and frequency
From: Jim Hutton (atheist1696_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/25/05
- Next message: Franz Heymann: "Re: How to explain physics effectively"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Franz Heymann: "Re: about phase and frequency"
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: about phase and frequency"
- Reply: Franz Heymann: "Re: about phase and frequency"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:29:59 -0600
Franz Heymann wrote:
> Feuerbacher has [] shat on ...
Is that the pluperfect subjunctive? :-)
- Next message: Franz Heymann: "Re: How to explain physics effectively"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Franz Heymann: "Re: about phase and frequency"
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: about phase and frequency"
- Reply: Franz Heymann: "Re: about phase and frequency"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
