Re: electrostatic confusion
From: CWatters (colin.watters_at_pandoraBOX.be)
Date: 02/27/05
- Next message: Ron Atkinson: "Re: Bring back the empire"
- Previous message: Aleksandr Timofeev: "Re: To Aleksandr Timofeev about Butusov's papers"
- In reply to: John O'Flaherty: "electrostatic confusion"
- Next in thread: John O'Flaherty: "Re: electrostatic confusion"
- Reply: John O'Flaherty: "Re: electrostatic confusion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:37:55 GMT
"John O'Flaherty" <quiasmox@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:38dcaiF5m0v24U1@individual.net...
> > But the book gives 2.5 kN/m as the answer to (b). Can anyone show me
> where I'm going wrong?
See if this thread helps...
http://www.edaboard.com/viewtopic.php?p=404849
If I understand it correctly...
The force on a charge in a uniform field is F=EQ however in your case the
field isn't uniform it's on "one side" of the charge so F = E*Q/2
Sorry if that's not a very satisfactory explanation.
- Next message: Ron Atkinson: "Re: Bring back the empire"
- Previous message: Aleksandr Timofeev: "Re: To Aleksandr Timofeev about Butusov's papers"
- In reply to: John O'Flaherty: "electrostatic confusion"
- Next in thread: John O'Flaherty: "Re: electrostatic confusion"
- Reply: John O'Flaherty: "Re: electrostatic confusion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]