Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?

From: Dirk Van de moortel (dirkvandemoortel_at_ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com)
Date: 02/27/05 

Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:11:34 GMT

"Jeany" <ctiei@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1109468962.712998.57610@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Dirk Van de moortel wrote:

[snip]

> > I had a quick look at the suggestions, but I really have
> > to interrupt you already, and you know the reason, since
> > I explained it more than once. Perhaps you forgot.
> > Before I look at anything else in (or about) the text, you
> > obviously must make the necessasy corrections to the
> > first section. Feel free to ask for advice if you have any
> > doubts about finding the correct formulation of the ideas.
> > When section 1.1 is fixed and okay, I will look at section
> > 1.2. Good luck!
> >
> > Dirk Vdm
>
> Dear Mr. Dirk Vdm,
>
> Sorry for mistyping "theatrical" for theoretical in my last
> message.
>
> I think the theoretical foundation of TAST consists of 3 parts, 1.1,
> 1.2 and 2.2 of the text. It may form a complete theoretical logic of
> TAST.
>
> I would like you to look at 2.2 Basic property of analytical space-time
> in chapter 2 as well to know why it is called "ANLYTICAL". It
> won't take you more than 5 minutes.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jeany

To be honest, I think the word theatrical was more appropriate :-)

As promised, I will look at 1.2 and beyond, as soon as you
have fixed 1.1, and, in the process, prove to me that you really
understand what you are talking about.

Dirk Vdm

Relevant Pages
Loading