Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?
From: Ken S. Tucker (dynamics_at_vianet.on.ca)
Date: 02/28/05
- Next message: JM Albuquerque: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Previous message: Jeany: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- In reply to: Jeany: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- Next in thread: Jeany: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 27 Feb 2005 17:12:19 -0800
Jeany wrote:
> Franz Heymann wrote:
> > "Jeany" <ctiei@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:1109517673.837834.192920@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > Please note: You said repeatedly that L T = L' T ' in SR would
> > result
> > > in L = L' = T = T' = 0 and you "proved" it by words only, as if
you
> > had
> > > measured something in a UFO like a extraterrestrial man (a joke),
> > > instead of by a math logic.
> >
> > Let's stop beating about the bush. Do you realise, Jeany, that you
> > are a snot-nosed little liar?
> > I have just looked back in the thread and a found a number of
> > independent contributions from Dirk in which he proved his point in
> > complete detail.
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > --
> > Franz
> > "The great tragedy of science -- the slaying of a beautiful
> hypothesis
> > by an ugly fact."
> > T.H. Huxley
>
> I am sorry to be dense. I couldn't find Mr. Dirk proved it in a math
> derivation that why LT=L'T' would result in L=T=L'=T'=0 only or
> it would mean 0=0. Would you please quote it in your reply? Anyway,
> would you kindly allow me to agree to what Mr. Dirk has "proved"
> for it in SR? It doesn't matter to TAST.
>
> Jeany
- Next message: JM Albuquerque: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Previous message: Jeany: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- In reply to: Jeany: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- Next in thread: Jeany: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
