Re: Inertial-dampening systems
msadkins04_at_yahoo.com
Date: 02/02/05
- Next message: Mr Clarke: "Re: FREE ENERGY Devices and Technology"
- Previous message: Mike: "Re: Antarctic's ice 'melting faster'"
- In reply to: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Next in thread: Davorak: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Reply: Davorak: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 2 Feb 2005 14:51:40 -0800
I've already replied to Hansen's text below: this is an addendum to my
own reply.
Gregory L. Hansen wrote:
> In article <1107377258.697776.109140@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> <msadkins04@yahoo.com> wrote:
<snip>
>
> >
> >I can see heat as a product of your fluid, if compressible, but why
> >assume it as a product of a variable strength magnetic field which
is
> >preserving the static position of a body suspended within it? The
> >craft is accelerating, the field is accelerating identically, and
the
> >body suspended in it is accelerating identically. Why heat in the
> >chamber from the field?
>
> Because it's a variable strength magnetic field. The person would be
the
> one-turn secondary of a transformer, the frozen burrito in the
microwave.
> Granted it's the electric field that moves the current, but curl E =
> -dB/dt from Maxwell's equations.
So, let's see...in the magnetic levitation experiments, as actually
performed, the change in magnetic field strength is 10 to 16 T (i.e.,
from an initial value of zero to an end value of 10-16 T). Why aren't
those frogs cooked, Mr. Hansen, if changes in field strength result in
heating currents in the levitated body? Please don't tell us that they
take hours to build up the magnetic field strength to those levels,
because they don't.
.
Mark Adkins
msadkins04@yahoo.com
- Next message: Mr Clarke: "Re: FREE ENERGY Devices and Technology"
- Previous message: Mike: "Re: Antarctic's ice 'melting faster'"
- In reply to: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Next in thread: Davorak: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Reply: Davorak: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|