Re: [OT] Isotope decay chains
From: Angelo (patrik56_at_libero.it)
Date: 02/28/05
- Next message: stephen_at_nomail.com: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Double-A: "Re: This is depressing news...Google wants to 'host' Wikipedia..."
- In reply to: Y.Porat: "Re: Isotope decay chains"
- Next in thread: Angelo: "Re: Isotope decay chains"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 27 Feb 2005 19:47:51 -0800
Y.Porat wrote:
> Angelo
> i di da quick research on you just yesterday in Google
> i was interested how and when you lended to this ng and here is just
> one quote:
> ---------------------------------------
> Angelo Sep 23 2004, 6:17 pm show options
>
> Newsgroups: sci.physics, sci.physics.electromag
> From: patri...@libero.it (Angelo) - Find messages by this author
> Date: 23 Sep 2004 18:17:41 -0700
> Local: Thurs, Sep 23 2004 6:17 pm
> Subject: Extra Low Frequencies
> Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original
> | Report Abuse
>
> hi all
>
>
> I have to admit that this post of mine was in part
> stimulated by reading the recent long debates between
> Y.Porat and Bjoern Feuerbacher. OTOH, even if I'm a
> chemist, I've always been attracted by some branches
> of physics and astronomy (both in an amateurish way,
> though). For example, I was much interested in
> constructing electric oscillators (at home, with
> basical tools as single transistors, inductances,
> and resistances) and possibly reaching the
> _lowest frequencies_ attainable with such now outdated
> and poor means (it was in mid-80s). It was
> end of quote
> -----------------------------------------------
No reply at all to my last one to you, I see.
There I answered point to point to your
accusations or misunderstandings.
And you don't care, you skip, and pass
to other stuff. And this is the 4th time IIRC.
Nothing to address? Or nothing to say?
Who is, between us, the one that stick to facts,
and the one that manage to use politic tactics?
> it was trhe first time i noticed you
> in that landing of you you catually reveal your motivations
> you aimed your atatck dorectly and personally against me
No, that assumption is false: if you read I was
interested exactly in extra low frequencies, and that since
I was just a little more than a child, so to say, i.e. many years
before that thread.
> you mentioned there Feuerbacher and dint hide your preference
But I mentioned also you, and in the fisrt place, and,
obviously, mentioning the two names served as a
reference to the matter. So, where (and how) you see
that direct and personal attack against you?
> between be and him
> in short it was a personal motivated intervention
> i forgot about it
> ]yet doring our long discussion in the current thread that started
> actually
> appositly and nicely
> gradually you became more and more hostile
I pointed out facts, data, objections, yes: is this hostility?
> ubtill th emask fel of your face probely unintentionally
> it became clear that you are absolutely and unconditionaly
> personaly aimes to abuse me
> and thtas where the red light litted.
> anyway
> since that intention was discovered i got my goal
Sorry to say, but you got the wrong one.
> ie
> i have no objection to legitimate *bon afide' critisism
That was my intention, indeed.
> i do have objection to personal politics.
Which I never pursued.
> once you protect a superfertz idea that is a red light litted
Just a little note. Where's your Fertz argument gone?
Perhaps I smashed it in a few lines of a post?
OTOH, I've already said that I can't rememer having
read about the Superfertz in that huge thread. So I was
asking you proper references. And still you don't care.
> 'the man is primarily interested in clan interests'
And all this can only be conceived by a disturbed fantasy.
> anyway
> since the mask is lift of - i did my job
Yes, the strange job to make a lot of effort in convincing
yourself about a non-existent problem.
> and hope the other readers will be convinced tha this is the
situation
Find your favorite judges, please.
> and will beable to judge my work more objectively
If you didn't notice, several times I said that I respect
your work, even if I cant' accept your conclusions, at least,
as far as you don't bring about testable, tangible evidence.
> i have no interest in personal fightings
Are you sure, after all those accusations you made to me?
> my prime interest is only that my work will not be waited thats all.
> and try to beleive me it is a sysiphic work,(you sayed you learned
some
>
> greek mythology..) an ungratefull work
Should I say again that understand and respect
what you've done? And if want you know why
I can understand and respect, I'll tell the following.
I pursued my interests in science even before the
beginning of high school, mainly in chemistry, physics,
and astronomy, and was trying to read as many books
as I could find. Time passing, they became unsatisfactory.
So, nearly every day, when leaving the school at 1.30 pm,
I used to go to the library in my native city, and stayed
there at least two hours reading more advanced books
(my first contact with the one by L. Pauling, besides
others), instead to go home and have my lunch.
So, when I was a student at university I soon recognized
having a team of teachers -- with the due exceptions, say
20 per cent -- well below what I was expecting. Thus,
my training was mostly accomplished by myself,
especially when passing days (and often nights, too) in
the university library... Ok, let's not annoy any more.
> s o no need to make it harder for me unjustifiedly.
I don't want it, and if you think that I've done any
harm, damage, or what else, well, if you show me
that, I'll seriously consider how to 'compensate'.
> if one day you change your mind and whant to lend a hand- wellcome.
See above, please.
Best regards,
Angelo
- Next message: stephen_at_nomail.com: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Double-A: "Re: This is depressing news...Google wants to 'host' Wikipedia..."
- In reply to: Y.Porat: "Re: Isotope decay chains"
- Next in thread: Angelo: "Re: Isotope decay chains"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
