The Concept of Space Expansion

From: TomGee (lvlus_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/03/05 

Date: 2 Feb 2005 16:20:41 -0800

Here is another excerpt from my essay revision, "The Time And Motion
Relationship", by Thomas Garcia, copyright 2005, which is a new idea
AFAIK that helps to resolve some issues with the BBT and the
Inflationary Period theory:

"It seems possible now for us to say that the basis of the initial
state or the fundamental state of our universe is Absolute space:
i.e., space devoid of matter. It may be possible to guess at the size
of our universe, but there is no way to estimate the size of Absolute
space as long as there is only our universe for comparison. There is
nothing, however, to contradict our theory - which is by far the most
simple - that there exists Absolute space into which the con-tents of
our universe were dumped, and that the "Great Void" is simply space
devoid of matter. This would mean that other universes - even
so-called parallel ones - could exist within the great void of Absolute
space. Ours may not have been the only Big Bang. In fact, it is more
reasonable to assume that ours is but one BB among many within the
Great Void.

There is a second scenario we must not overlook: We may assume that
Absolute space was first filled with matter having negative
energy/mass, i.e., so-called Dark Matter. If so, we may perhaps have
no need for an Inflationary Period with which to explain the reason for
the current distribution of visible matter since Dark Matter could
explain it if we can show that visible matter takes a back seat to the
power of invisible matter such that it must be a major factor in any
Grand Unified Theory.
How could that be? Well, the I.P. essentially explains the homogeneity
of elements in the universe, which is a phenomena not explained by the
Big Bang Theory.

Let's suppose, however, that the BB occurred as I have said above,
where space did not come out of the explosion but that the BB emptied
out into absolute space. The objection to this scenario is the
observable effect that the universe is expanding at an accelerating
rate, and it must be space which is expanding since the coordinates of
objects in space do not change as they should if the expansion process
included their moving apart. If space did not come out of the BB, the
expansion process requires that it include visible objects which are
moving apart from each other such that their coordinates will change,
but observations show that is not happening. Thus, it seems the only
alternative is that it must be space which is expanding since visible
objects of the cosmos move apart but maintain the same coordinates in
space, and so, if space is expanding, it must have come out of the BB.

My model, however, proposes still another scenario, one which can
explain the process of expansion without space having to expand along
with it, and simpler than the concept of space expansion. We know now
that Dark Matter and Dark Energy exists and that there is a whole more
of it than there is visible matter. It would have been such matter and
energy that predominantly spewed forth out of the BB explosion into
empty space first.
We believe today that it is Dark Matter and Energy (DM/E) which is
maintaining the most delicate balance of gravitational effects which
prevent the universe from collapsing back onto itself. If so, it must
have come out of the BB too. And since there is so much more of it
than there is of visible matter, we can assume it came out first and is
still coming out and filling our space in the process of universal
expansion. Thus, the expansion of the universe is occurring by
additional flowing of DM/E into our space between visible objects and
also by extending the boundaries of the universe."

We cannot know if more visible matter is coming out of the BB, but it
is probable that it is if we agree that DM/E still is. So, hit me with
all the brains at your disposal and show the world what you're made of.
TomGee 020205

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Concept of Space Expansion
    ... >i.e., space devoid of matter. ... >of our universe, but there is no way to estimate the size of Absolute ... >explain it if we can show that visible matter takes a back seat to the ... >objects in space do not change as they should if the expansion process ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: The Concept of Space Expansion
    ... >i.e., space devoid of matter. ... >of our universe, but there is no way to estimate the size of Absolute ... >explain it if we can show that visible matter takes a back seat to the ... >objects in space do not change as they should if the expansion process ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Question about the Big Bang and Dark Matter
    ... It wasn't an explosion of stuff, ... The distribution of matter at the time of the CMBR was uniform, ... believed that the expansion slowed during the first few ... matter in the Universe at the instant of the Big Bang, ...
    (sci.astro)
  • The Concept of Space Expansion
    ... i.e., space devoid of matter. ... of our universe, but there is no way to estimate the size of Absolute ... explain it if we can show that visible matter takes a back seat to the ... objects in space do not change as they should if the expansion process ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Questions about the expansion of space
    ... so homogeneously and isotropically throughout the universe. ... matter, as in the now generally discredited steady-state theory. ... Since the expansion of space is occuring everywhere, ... subject to the same density decrease. ...
    (sci.astro)
Quantcast