Re: Good book for learning physics?
From: Dirk Van de moortel (dirkvandemoortel_at_ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com)
Date: 02/03/05
- Next message: tadchem: "Re: curses are needed"
- Previous message: Creighton Hogg: "Re: gravitons"
- In reply to: mikeboarder: "Good book for learning physics?"
- Next in thread: hhc314_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Good book for learning physics?"
- Reply: hhc314_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Good book for learning physics?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 16:41:57 GMT
"mikeboarder" <mikeboarder83@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:67aac0ef.0502030605.345cc651@posting.google.com...
> I've been told that Serway & Faughn is a good book for learning
> physics.
> Are there many people that agree?
> Because I like a good book, that explanes stuff from the beginning
> (experiments, theories etc.), and not just states laws. I like to know
> why things behave the way they do. and a recent writing that not
> conlfilcts old (wrong) principles with new findings... and not too
> basic...
> thanx very much!
Hewitt's "Conceptual Physics" is what you probably will enjoy
the most:
http://www.conceptualphysics.com/
Dirk Vdm
- Next message: tadchem: "Re: curses are needed"
- Previous message: Creighton Hogg: "Re: gravitons"
- In reply to: mikeboarder: "Good book for learning physics?"
- Next in thread: hhc314_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Good book for learning physics?"
- Reply: hhc314_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Good book for learning physics?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|