Re: The Concept of Space Expansion
From: John C. Polasek (jpolasek_at_cfl.rr.com)
Date: 02/04/05
- Next message: James : "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: Updates on History of Bharatiya Science-Technology web site"
- In reply to: TomGee: "The Concept of Space Expansion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 20:04:36 -0500
On 2 Feb 2005 16:20:41 -0800, "TomGee" <lvlus@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Here is another excerpt from my essay revision, "The Time And Motion
>Relationship", by Thomas Garcia, copyright 2005, which is a new idea
>AFAIK that helps to resolve some issues with the BBT and the
>Inflationary Period theory:
>
>"It seems possible now for us to say that the basis of the initial
>state or the fundamental state of our universe is Absolute space:
>i.e., space devoid of matter. It may be possible to guess at the size
>of our universe, but there is no way to estimate the size of Absolute
>space as long as there is only our universe for comparison. There is
>nothing, however, to contradict our theory - which is by far the most
>simple - that there exists Absolute space into which the con-tents of
>our universe were dumped, and that the "Great Void" is simply space
>devoid of matter. This would mean that other universes - even
>so-called parallel ones - could exist within the great void of Absolute
>space. Ours may not have been the only Big Bang. In fact, it is more
>reasonable to assume that ours is but one BB among many within the
>Great Void.
>
>There is a second scenario we must not overlook: We may assume that
>Absolute space was first filled with matter having negative
>energy/mass, i.e., so-called Dark Matter. If so, we may perhaps have
>no need for an Inflationary Period with which to explain the reason for
>the current distribution of visible matter since Dark Matter could
>explain it if we can show that visible matter takes a back seat to the
>power of invisible matter such that it must be a major factor in any
>Grand Unified Theory.
>How could that be? Well, the I.P. essentially explains the homogeneity
>of elements in the universe, which is a phenomena not explained by the
>Big Bang Theory.
>
>Let's suppose, however, that the BB occurred as I have said above,
>where space did not come out of the explosion but that the BB emptied
>out into absolute space. The objection to this scenario is the
>observable effect that the universe is expanding at an accelerating
>rate, and it must be space which is expanding since the coordinates of
>objects in space do not change as they should if the expansion process
>included their moving apart. If space did not come out of the BB, the
>expansion process requires that it include visible objects which are
>moving apart from each other such that their coordinates will change,
>but observations show that is not happening. Thus, it seems the only
>alternative is that it must be space which is expanding since visible
>objects of the cosmos move apart but maintain the same coordinates in
>space, and so, if space is expanding, it must have come out of the BB.
>
>My model, however, proposes still another scenario, one which can
>explain the process of expansion without space having to expand along
>with it, and simpler than the concept of space expansion. We know now
>that Dark Matter and Dark Energy exists and that there is a whole more
>of it than there is visible matter. It would have been such matter and
>energy that predominantly spewed forth out of the BB explosion into
>empty space first.
>We believe today that it is Dark Matter and Energy (DM/E) which is
>maintaining the most delicate balance of gravitational effects which
>prevent the universe from collapsing back onto itself. If so, it must
>have come out of the BB too. And since there is so much more of it
>than there is of visible matter, we can assume it came out first and is
>still coming out and filling our space in the process of universal
>expansion. Thus, the expansion of the universe is occurring by
>additional flowing of DM/E into our space between visible objects and
>also by extending the boundaries of the universe."
>
>We cannot know if more visible matter is coming out of the BB, but it
>is probable that it is if we agree that DM/E still is. So, hit me with
>all the brains at your disposal and show the world what you're made of.
>TomGee 020205
There seems to be a lot of argument of the arm-waving variety about
the expansion of the universe. In my dual space theory I have a fairly
simple version with simple equations and a drawing. Because of the
drawing, I put the diagram and equations at Expansion theory at
http://www.dualspace.net.
I worked this out this afternoon, I would like to argue.
John Polasek
If you have something to say write an equation.
If you have nothing to say, write an essay.
- Next message: James : "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: Updates on History of Bharatiya Science-Technology web site"
- In reply to: TomGee: "The Concept of Space Expansion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
