Re: Has anyone heard of a [-1;1] logic?

From: Eric Gisse (jowr.pi_at_gmail.com)
Date: 02/05/05 

Date: 4 Feb 2005 22:01:20 -0800

jgreenfield@seol.net.au wrote:
> Eric Gisse wrote:
> > jgreenfield@seol.net.au wrote:
> > > I have a long standing commitment to bare my arse on this group,
to
> > > anyone who can provide an example of a "less than zero" physical
> > > entity;
> > > that is, a negative which represents other than a position
> > > (coordinate), direction, or opposite.
> >
> > All you do when you bare your ass is blow *** everywhere.
>
> Pick a proton, and an electron. Write the charge of one in terms of
> the
> > other. ONE of them is gonna be negative.
> >
>
> Prove it!!!!!

If I have to prove the obvious to you, it means one of two things.
Either you are my complex analysis instructor who assigns us 60
problems to make sure we understand z = a + bi and all the implications
thereof. Or you are an idiot who just cannot absorb information. How
many times has this been explained to you?

> Stick your finger in a power socket, and record the "less than zero"
> jolt you get, fuckwit. By the look of your answers, you've done it
> before. Positive/negative for protons and electrons are LABELS. You
> could call them "up" and "down".

House current is AC, not DC. Average anything AC and you will get a
positive number.

> The "negative" description of an electron has F*A* to do with being a
> "less than zero" physical entity.

What held you back from saying "*** all"? You were cussing up a storm
not a moment ago.

> >
> >> >
> > > In nature, there is "on/off", 1/0 and NO third choice (-1)
> > > .....ALL a negative can represent is a "less than" something
which
> is
> > > >0, but NEVER be less than 0, which is a natural, physical
> > > impossibility.
> >
> > Did you fail highschool algebra when the concept of negative
numbers
> > were introduced?
>
> Nope! Topped the class, because I realised that they are for
IMAGINARY
> SITUATIONS, when the net result gives a less than zero answer.
> That's why I realise that having (-5) electrons doesn't change them
> into protons..........and you don't.

Oh.

I guess you are the type of person who can NOT function abstractly.
Every concept you use has to have a 1:1 corrospondance to reality else
your brain will fry itself.

I bet you would love complex analysis.

What is the square root of -1?

>
> Jim G
> c'=c+v (BB=BS)

Quantcast