Re: Science/Physics Forums that SUCK
From: Uncle Al (UncleAl0_at_hate.spam.net)
Date: 02/06/05
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Some Contradictory Claims in SR:"
- Previous message: Jason: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Brad Guth: "Re: Science/Physics Forums that SUCK"
- Next in thread: tj Frazir: "Re: Science/Physics Forums that SUCK"
- Reply: tj Frazir: "Re: Science/Physics Forums that SUCK"
- Reply: Brad Guth: "Re: Science/Physics Forums that SUCK"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 16:55:39 -0800
Brad Guth wrote:
>
> What speaks for itself?
>
> Was it the topic: "Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
[snip]
That is sufficiently diagnostic. Guth, why don't you give us a little
hint of what biology occurs at 480 C, that being the locally measured
surface temp of Venus by the USSR probe that landed. The accompanying
1300 psi of CO2 plus sulfuric acid will take care of themselves.
Don't bother spewing anything connected with carbon chemistry or
silicone polymers. Forget soldered connections in their computers,
too. 50/50 solder melts at 420 C, and CPUs crap out by 100 C.
-- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Some Contradictory Claims in SR:"
- Previous message: Jason: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Brad Guth: "Re: Science/Physics Forums that SUCK"
- Next in thread: tj Frazir: "Re: Science/Physics Forums that SUCK"
- Reply: tj Frazir: "Re: Science/Physics Forums that SUCK"
- Reply: Brad Guth: "Re: Science/Physics Forums that SUCK"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|