Re: Magnetic Monopoles Found? Dual-Slit Expe Explained?
From: Y.Porat (maporat_at_012.net.il)
Date: 02/06/05
- Next message: maison.mousse: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Previous message: Qion: "Re: Physics of Energy Allergy & NAET Treatment"
- Maybe in reply to: Qion: "Re: Magnetic Monopoles Found? Dual-Slit Expe Explained?"
- Next in thread: Qion: "Re: Magnetic Monopoles Found? Dual-Slit Expe Explained?"
- Reply: Qion: "Re: Magnetic Monopoles Found? Dual-Slit Expe Explained?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 6 Feb 2005 00:57:54 -0800
i only now monitored my name on this thread
so i would lkiek to make some correction:
my model does not contradict the standard model--
*all laong*!!
my claim agianst the sm is that it is too abstract
to be useful as a leadinf model should be!!
ans my rejections are here and tther not against
the verified parts of SM
it is against some wrong *interpretations
and wrong jumping into conclusions*
for instance
that in a heavy atom the numer of electrons must be
exactly as that of protons
that the nuc is sperical
etc etc
all those last ones are just *private inter[retations'
of some asserive peiople that has nothing
substantiated experimentally
it is just 'filling up' private imaginations in [places
that unknowns exist.
------------------
all the best
Y.Porat
------------------------------
- Next message: maison.mousse: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Previous message: Qion: "Re: Physics of Energy Allergy & NAET Treatment"
- Maybe in reply to: Qion: "Re: Magnetic Monopoles Found? Dual-Slit Expe Explained?"
- Next in thread: Qion: "Re: Magnetic Monopoles Found? Dual-Slit Expe Explained?"
- Reply: Qion: "Re: Magnetic Monopoles Found? Dual-Slit Expe Explained?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|