Re: Code breakers beat security scheme of car locks, gas pumps
From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 02/06/05
- Next message: Daryl McCullough: "Re: scale-free complexity may be wrong: CUNY"
- Previous message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Spectral line AAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Guy Gordon: "Re: Code breakers beat security scheme of car locks, gas pumps"
- Next in thread: Guy Gordon: "Re: Code breakers beat security scheme of car locks, gas pumps"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 09:49:08 -0500
Guy Gordon wrote:
> "robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> wrote:
>
>
>>The axiom of axioms in cryptography is that the security is in the key,
>>not the alogorithm. ANY alogorithm A can conceive, B can analyze (recall
>>Enigma during WW2). Key management is the key to cryptographic security.
>
>
> No key is of any use if the algorithm is a simple XOR, or the implementation has
> a back-door.
The back door is not an essential part of cryptography. One can always
engineer an ecryption/decryption scheme -without- a back door. XOR works
fine with a one time pad. Key management means throwing away the random
key after just one use.
Bob Kolker
- Next message: Daryl McCullough: "Re: scale-free complexity may be wrong: CUNY"
- Previous message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Spectral line AAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Guy Gordon: "Re: Code breakers beat security scheme of car locks, gas pumps"
- Next in thread: Guy Gordon: "Re: Code breakers beat security scheme of car locks, gas pumps"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|