Re: scale-free complexity may be wrong: CUNY
From: Daryl McCullough (stevendaryl3016_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/06/05
- Next message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Accelerating universe"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Code breakers beat security scheme of car locks, gas pumps"
- In reply to: Edward Green: "Re: scale-free complexity may be wrong: CUNY"
- Next in thread: Edward Green: "Re: scale-free complexity may be wrong: CUNY"
- Reply: Edward Green: "Re: scale-free complexity may be wrong: CUNY"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 6 Feb 2005 06:37:09 -0800
Edward Green says...
>
>sawlake-gg@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>> CUNY researchers have contradicted common assumptions about fractal
>> patterns in complex networks, showing large webs are in fact
>> self-similar:
>> http://glikglik.blogspot.com/2005/01/self-similarity-shocker.html
>
>You are full of it.
>
>First of all, why don't you link to at least an article descriping the
>work second hand, instead of somebody's (your?) _blog_ describing it
>third hand? What kind of "reference" is that?
What in the world is your problem, Ed? You follow that link, and
you immediately see a pointer to
http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20050129/fob3.asp
It takes two seconds, and you are complaining?
Your hostile reaction is bizarre.
-- Daryl McCullough Ithaca, NY
- Next message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Accelerating universe"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Code breakers beat security scheme of car locks, gas pumps"
- In reply to: Edward Green: "Re: scale-free complexity may be wrong: CUNY"
- Next in thread: Edward Green: "Re: scale-free complexity may be wrong: CUNY"
- Reply: Edward Green: "Re: scale-free complexity may be wrong: CUNY"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|