Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong
guskz_at_hotmail.com
Date: 02/07/05
- Next message: PD: "Re: can we achieve unity?"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong"
- Reply: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong"
- Reply: PD: "Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong"
- Reply: Jesse Mazer: "Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong"
- Reply: Nick: "Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 7 Feb 2005 12:41:42 -0800
There are but a few simple lines (5 sentences) below until a Conclusion
is reached.
Someone must clearly specify the first line he reads that is incorrect
and why.....if no error is wrong than there remains insufficient
evidence of time dilation (outside the muons experiment).
Setting:
We will call 2 platforms: A & B
A goes 10km/s and B goes 40km/s in relation to Earth (difference =
30km/s)
Now if Earth disappeared, the only thing A would observe is that B is
30km/s faster and likewise B would observe A moving 30km/s.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Symptom:
Relativity's Law specifies there is no Universal Absolute Reference
Frame (everything is relative), so by this law it is irrelevant to Time
Dilation wether A must *accelerate* or *decelerate* to reach same
velocity as B.
This same symptom also applies to B if it wishes to reach A's velocity.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conclusion:
By the symptoms provide above, it is impossible for A or B to age
differently than the other and therefore there cannot be any Time
Dilation.
Likewise, it is impossible for a twin to leave A, until he reaches the
same velocity as B and then accumulate an age difference *depending* on
how long he remains at the same velocity as B (also the same if twin is
leaving B and going to A).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Incoherence:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/airtim.html
1971 Plane that noticed a time dilation using an atomic clock may
suggest:
1. The Universe has an absolute frame of reference
or
2. The link above specifies that a gravity field also generates a time
dilation (the more gravity the slower the clock): Could be similar to a
pendulum clock swaying slower if it's at the bottom of heavy water
(more gravity force) instead of air.
...but if this pendulum (atomic clock inside the plane) was traveling
faster in the air then it would also sway slower since it would *feel*
the same displacement resistance(= permittivity = 1/c^2 for space) as
when it was at the bottom of heavy water.
- Next message: PD: "Re: can we achieve unity?"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong"
- Reply: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong"
- Reply: PD: "Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong"
- Reply: Jesse Mazer: "Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong"
- Reply: Nick: "Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|