Re: Men on the moon?
From: tj Frazir (GravityPhysics_at_webtv.net)
Date: 02/08/05
- Next message: Mitch Perkins: "Re: Escaping Detection, the Soft Way."
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Androcles: "Re: Men on the moon?"
- Next in thread: tj Frazir: "Re: Men on the moon?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 19:01:05 -0500
But you cant do the math can you .
Your standing on a board and cantshift your wieght ,,and must use
thrust.
If you push against the ship to stop and corect a fall the surf board
wll push out and you fall on your face.
You must press down on top of the ship and lift the falling side
because you cant push off the ship or you fall over.
THESE ARE PHYSICAL FACTS.
I listed the facts and all you do is ignore the facts.
YOUR falling over ans stop your fall by pushing against the ship...the
board moves away from the ship.
YOUR too stupid and ignorant to understand nasa was falling over and
pushed to the side like you think you can.
ALL nasa thusters had to point down to work but they used a side
thuster because they lied and was not on the moon.
Im no fucking hoaxster.
I went out on my board the same day and played with the idia I saw nasa
do thisss.
Plain as day out the window I see the side thuster fire wile he
comented rolling ..
I have the lunar lander modle still and see the trusters. They neaded
3 sticking out but pointing down as to lift the falling side.
They fucking did it wrong like you think you can.
- Next message: Mitch Perkins: "Re: Escaping Detection, the Soft Way."
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Androcles: "Re: Men on the moon?"
- Next in thread: tj Frazir: "Re: Men on the moon?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]