Re: An interesting SR puzzle
From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 02/08/05
- Next message: Timo Nieminen: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- In reply to: jgreenfield_at_seol.net.au: "Re: An interesting SR puzzle"
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: An interesting SR puzzle"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 22:48:52 -0500
jgreenfield@seol.net.au wrote:
> Try this clock test for gravitational time dilation:
> Erect a high vertical rotating shaft, which physically operates a
> clock/counter attached to the bottom and top.
You are assuming the shaft is rigid. It is not. The notion of rigid body
is an idealization and does not exist in the real world. If rigid bodies
really exist you could use a very long rigid rod to send messages faster
than light.
Bob Kolker
- Next message: Timo Nieminen: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- In reply to: jgreenfield_at_seol.net.au: "Re: An interesting SR puzzle"
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: An interesting SR puzzle"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|