Twin Paradox is a blasphemy to Relativity

guskz_at_hotmail.com
Date: 02/08/05 

Date: 8 Feb 2005 05:19:29 -0800

First of all it is ILLEGAL to say if the brother is ACCELERATING or
DECELERATING from his twin for you cannot apply a + or - vector to
either one's velocity without infringing on Relativity and defining an
Absolute Space.

So if we cannot apply a Newtonian Mechanic Principal to Relativity and
say if the brother is moving faster or slower than his twin (only that
they have a difference of velocity between them) therefore IT IS
IMPOSSIBLE TO say which one is aging less than the other.

TIME DILATION IS FLAWED.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Israeli rabbinate idiocy
    ... better than Islam or the Taliban or any other fundamentalist meshigass. ... Ahh. ... I see we have developed a new correlary to Godwin's law: ...
    (soc.culture.jewish.moderated)
  • Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
    ... I will say one thing about the ENDLESS series of posts on the twin paradox, because a lot of these guys are NOT stupid; they are absolute PROOF that something is missing, or at least extremely misleading, in the normal explanation, because the actual math is very basic and fairly straightforward. ... Furthermore, let's say that twin B accelerates in just 1 hour to a velocity of 0.866c as seen by A and B, and stays at that velocity for several years until just before he gets back, when he decelerates in an hour to zero. ... That is both false and silly, but I THINK that many people -- perhaps even a few physicists, I'm not certain -- believe that this is what relativity is all about, that "according to relativity," it really is B's velocity relative to A, and ONLY B's velocity relative to A, that determines B's age when he returns to A. ... It would be a very understandable error, because when two INERTIAL observers C and D look at each other, and remain inertial the whole time, then C really does appear to D to be slower, heavier, and shorter than normal, and vice-versa, D also appears the same to C. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Twin Paradox is a blasphemy to Relativity
    ... >> So if we cannot apply a Newtonian Mechanic Principal to Relativity ... >> say if the brother is moving faster or slower than his twin (only ... >> they have a difference of velocity between them) therefore IT IS ... "Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen." ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity
    ... First of all it is ILLEGAL to say if the brother is ACCELERATING or ... DECELERATING from his twin for you cannot apply a + or - vector to ... So if we cannot apply a Newtonian Mechanic Principal to Relativity and ... they have a difference of velocity between them) therefore IT IS ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Astronomy in SF- Astronomical Society of the Pacific
    ... Right foot: The asymmetry of time dilation when Tom and Pat are ... there's actual objective facts -- which insofar as relativity is ... that the twin that goes out comes back younger than the twin that ... The issue is that "velocity" is a relative term, ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)