Re: Men on the moon?

From: Mark Fergerson (nunya_at_biz.ness)
Date: 02/08/05 

Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 10:04:45 -0700

tj Frazir wrote:
> No conspieracy bull***.
> I have 2 facts.
> 1 the speed of fall on the moon nasa claims is 1/6

   I've seen you claim that elsewhere. The force of gravitational
attraction at the Moon's surface is roughly one-sixth that at the
Earth's surface. Rate of fall is easily found from that.

   Are you claiming that the attractive force at Lunar surface is the
same as at Earth's surface?

> 2 .. the fact nasa used a side thuster when all the thusters MUST point
> down .

   Oh, horse***. Still can't handle vector addition?

> You are ignoring the facts like you think Ill forget them.
> Why would I post the facts again ? You will just forget the facts
> befor you get to the end of the page .
> I dont care what you think happend under the pier.

   Sure you don't, because you have no experience to back up your
ravings. I _know_ how not to fall off a surfboard. You ever been on one?

> Your not trying to argue any facts so you wount have to deal with the
> facts.

   What "facts" do you have, that support your claim that Lunar gravity
is the same as Earth's?

> Youll take the libral way out andcall me a conspearacy thieorist .

   I'm not a Liberal.

> The conspearacy morons cant do the math.

   Where's _your_ math to support your claim that Lunar gravity is equal
to Earth's?

> beside the fact you are stupid and dont understand the facts ...

   You wouldn't know a fact if it bit you on the ass.

   Mark L. Fergerson

Loading