Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down.
From: Androcles (Androcles_at_)
Date: 02/08/05
- Next message: John W. Kennedy: "Re: Beethoven's 5th Symphony"
- Previous message: Henri Wilson: "Re: GPS vs. Source Dependency"
- In reply to: Daryl McCullough: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- Next in thread: Daryl McCullough: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- Reply: Daryl McCullough: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:42:21 GMT
"Daryl McCullough" <stevendaryl3016@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cub34q026sc@drn.newsguy.com...
> Androcles says...
>
>>Einstein defines it as (16+4)/2 = 16
>
> No, he does not.
Yes, I've got it now.
He didn't say
"we establish by definition that the ``time'' required by light to
travel from A to B equals the ``time'' it requires to travel from B to
A. " when he said "we establish by definition that the ``time'' required
by light to travel from A to B equals the ``time'' it requires to travel
from B to A. "
Have a nice day in the asylum, McCullough.
Androcles.
- Next message: John W. Kennedy: "Re: Beethoven's 5th Symphony"
- Previous message: Henri Wilson: "Re: GPS vs. Source Dependency"
- In reply to: Daryl McCullough: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- Next in thread: Daryl McCullough: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- Reply: Daryl McCullough: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|