Re: The Bending of Space
From: Raymond Yohros (bat_at_birdband.net)
Date: 02/08/05
- Next message: Raymond Yohros: "Re: The Bending of Space"
- Previous message: Daryl McCullough: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- In reply to: G=EMC^2 Glazier: "Re: The Bending of Space"
- Next in thread: Raymond Yohros: "Re: The Bending of Space"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 8 Feb 2005 14:02:31 -0800
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Raymond Here is a question for you Einstien > Raymond Not sure why
Einstien thought time was more important than
> space?? Maybe because there is a limit to an objects spatial
velocity:
> the maximum speed through apace occurs if "all" of an object"s motion
> through"time" is diverted to motion through space. Very tricky stuff
to
> understand how Einstien revolutioned our understanding of space and
time
> by showing that they warp and distort to communicate the force of
> gravity. also
> told us that "all objects in the universe are always traveling
through
> spacetime at one fixed speed-that of light" How do you answer that
very
> strange idea? After all we go by the notion that objects travel at a
> speed less than light.Hmmmmm Tricky stuff Bert
i can't picture how time can exist without space or viceversa.
when space grows, so it's the flow of time
when space shrinks, time slows down
answering you're trick question:
to travel through spaceTIME things need to be at full speed
while any speed below it it's just traveling through space
regards
raymond
- Next message: Raymond Yohros: "Re: The Bending of Space"
- Previous message: Daryl McCullough: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- In reply to: G=EMC^2 Glazier: "Re: The Bending of Space"
- Next in thread: Raymond Yohros: "Re: The Bending of Space"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|