Re: Operation Crackpot Patrol
From: Dan Bloomquist (EXTRApublic21_at_lakeweb.com)
Date: 02/09/05
- Next message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Paul Stowe: "Re: Operation Crackpot Patrol"
- Next in thread: tj Frazir: "Re: Operation Crackpot Patrol"
- Reply: tj Frazir: "Re: Operation Crackpot Patrol"
- Reply: Morituri-|-Max: "Re: Operation Crackpot Patrol"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 01:29:16 GMT
Paul Stowe wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 06:23:21 GMT, Dan Bloomquist <EXTRApublic21@lakeweb.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>Last was, Paul Stowe and Androcles.
>
> Now how in the world is,
>
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/95bc9d46dd630fc1?dmode=source
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/6d6fed956a894f41?dmode=source
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/4d09c9c0c7c6fdb2?dmode=source
>
> by any rational definition, trolling?
You are right, my apologies.
> In fact, as can be seen in the above exchange, I drop the discussion
> that was distinctly leading to a intractible difference of opinion.
Not at all. It is not my opinion how science is done. But you wrote the
likes of:
"Science is all about zeroing in on an explanation of natural processes."
Now, I may be wrong, but I can't think of a single example in physical
science that fits your definition. And maybe my assumption of what you
call an explanation is wrong. If you mean model, I agree. But you
previously wrote:
"If anyone presents an alternate view or claims. or, heaven forbide
state they think QM, SR, GR is somehow wrong, BAM!"
Well, there are no alternative views. Science is about modeling and only
one model can be the most correct. If QM, SR, or GR were wrong, they
would be falsified by observation. If those that claim something is
wrong with say, SR, would only bother to understand this, there would be
a lot less BAMing going on.
> As far as I can tell by search, or memory, this is the ONLY discussion
> we have ever had?
I don't recall if we have. But I've been here on and off for some time.
I've learned an awful lot by reading stuff by the folks that really do
science.
>
> Paul Stowe
Best, Dan.
-- http://lakeweb.net http://ReserveAnalyst.com No EXTRA stuff for email. What can you see if you can't see it all...
- Next message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Paul Stowe: "Re: Operation Crackpot Patrol"
- Next in thread: tj Frazir: "Re: Operation Crackpot Patrol"
- Reply: tj Frazir: "Re: Operation Crackpot Patrol"
- Reply: Morituri-|-Max: "Re: Operation Crackpot Patrol"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|