Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science

From: Albert (albertwagner_at_cox.net)
Date: 02/09/05 

Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:47:03 -0600

mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu wrote:
<snip>
> The question of what technical vocabulary to use, in any specific
> area, is best left to the people actively involved in said area. If
> and when you, as a layman, find some of the terminology unclear, feel
> free to ask for explanations. That's all.

That would be fine, except when you crosspost to non-math
newsgroups. Perhaps you, and those like you, would display some
courtesy and remove non-math NGs from your replies. Don't go
wandering through the ghetto, sticking you head into peoples
windows shouting jabberwocky and then feign surprise when they
try to lynch you. 

-- 
"Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the 
range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally 
impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it."
     -- George Orwell as Syme in "1984"

Relevant Pages