Re: New Cubic Atomic Model explains electron energy levels and bonding

From: Y.Porat (maporat_at_012.net.il)
Date: 02/09/05 

Date: 9 Feb 2005 04:31:43 -0800

PD wrote:
> Y.Porat wrote:
> > ok lets have it
> > i suspect you either dont know waht you are talking about
> > or else you are cheting
> > and that is far more worse
> > so once again:
> > where is the experimetal evidence for
> > 6 elctron shells of lead
> > in which they are built the folowing way:
> > got it MrPD i would like to see the exct folowing structure
evidence:
> >
> > 2 8 16 32 18 4
> > or wahtever is the alleged exact figures
> > no general hand waving and no cheting just that structure
> > one by one of its componenets
> > first the 2
> > than the 8
> > than the 32
> > than the 18
> > etc etc
> > got it Mr hand waver ??
> > and if you dont have it
> > *dont cheat*
> > and say the truth as it is in facts.
> > TIA
> > Y.Porat
> > ----------------------
>
> Photoionisation process in the 5d, 6s and 6p shells of atomic lead
and

i was asking about 4 elctrons in the shell no 6
> the 4d shell of atomic tin H Derenbach, H Kossmann, R Malutzki and V

18 electrons in the shell no 5

---------------------

> Schmidt Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics Vol. 17
> Issue 14 Article 009 1984-07-28
>
> JETP Letters -- May 5, 1976 -- Volume 23, Issue 9, pp. 488-491
> Intensity of mesic x-ray transitions in lead, thorium, and uranium
--------------
32 electrons in the shell No 3
-----------------

> V. S. Buttsev, Z. Ganzorig, V. Kozokar, T. Krogulski, H.-G. Ortlepp,
S.
> M. Polikanov, B. M. Sabirov, W. D. Fromm, U. Schmidt, and D. Chulthem
,
> Joint Institute for Nuclear Research

* electrons in shell No 2

>
> Read them.
-------------
 2 electron shells
in shell No 1

do they suply that information
one by one to each electron 'personally'
ie how can you tellfor instance that it is
one of the 18 electrons of shell say no 4
and not one of say 12 electrons.

2 i dont have any of those books
or any access to them

so may be someone else can suply the bottom lines-
*in an honest *responsible * way*
or may be you just count on my lack of posibility
to access those books.
3 i asume that all that informatin is experimental data
and not 'theorethic data. or only partiially
or superficially
answering my question
TIA
Y.Porat
ps PD thank you even for that partial information you brought
yet not at all sure thaty you realy answerd my question
as it was presented above in the former articles.
as for now i have not the tools to judge it
unless you bring it in detail
----------------

Relevant Pages

  • Re: My New Website
    ... dont you realise just now that you are unable to calculate ... ie no many shells and no many 'shmells' in ther Au atom ... >> that shold not be compatible witht the shell model ... >> since they have much different numbers of electrons!! ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: S4E13 The Other Three Doctors, or Yer, right...
    ... >>>> Your use of shell instead of shells indicates that you obviously ... > about electron *shells* at all in relation to valency, ... The subject was about the quantum model of the atom which you are ... electrons form shells and subshells around it dictated by quantum theory. ...
    (rec.arts.drwho)
  • Re: S4E13 The Other Three Doctors, or Yer, right...
    ... It pulled atoms apart by neutralising the ... spare electrons" - i.e. the components of the atom are ... An atom only has one valence ...
    (rec.arts.drwho)
  • Re: nuclear shell model periodic table
    ... >> you know well that the shell model is far fome being something ... >> beside the croock club that you belong as well ... stupid shell model of electrons with the lanthanoid problem ... there is nothing about the geometric structre of the nuc ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Why... (OT)
    ... sodium ions on nerve transmission. ... with electrons occupying a series of shells ... is building a model of an atom, one starts with the inner-most shell, ... outer shell electrons - thus leaving only the ...
    (uk.people.support.depression)