Re: Isotope decay chains
From: tadchem (thomas.davidson_at_dla.mil)
Date: 02/09/05
- Next message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: This just in: Faith-based Science"
- Maybe in reply to: Y.Porat: "Re: Isotope decay chains"
- Next in thread: Y.Porat: "Re: Isotope decay chains"
- Reply: Y.Porat: "Re: Isotope decay chains"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 9 Feb 2005 06:25:34 -0800
Y.Porat wrote:
> so where is the prove of their say chemical or other properties
> of Co60 becoming Ni60 are identucal tothe 'other Ni60
>
> but have you or anyone studied all th e properties of that Ni 60
> that was created in the way you described above ??? versus the
> 'ordinary' Ni 60??
> or may be you take it just fo rgranted that they are identical??
My apologies, but I am having trouble parsing your 'question' from the
post due to the confusing grammatical structures.
The data I have identifies 2 isomers of Co-60
http://nucleardata.nuclear.lu.se/NuclearData/toi/listnuc.asp?sql=&A1=60&A2=60&Z=27
They are called "Co-60' and 'Co-60m'.
The one with the 'm' suffix after the mass number is 'metastable' and
has a distictively different half-life and nuclear spin (measurable
with NMR).
The *chemical* properties are a function of the atomic number (which
identifies the element) and the mass number (which perturbs the
kinetics). For nuclear isomers, there are no *chemical* differences.
The high energy gamma radiation is ssociated with the dacay of Co-60.
Mostly, the Co-60m decays by internal transformation into Co-60, but
*both* isomers can decay into Ni-60 through beta emission. The gamma
radiation associated with the beta decay is different for the two
isomers:
http://nucleardata.nuclear.lu.se/NuclearData/toi/Gamma.asp?sql=&sortBy=AZ&A1=60&A2=60&Z=27
I only have data on one isomer of Ni-60:
http://nucleardata.nuclear.lu.se/NuclearData/toi/listnuc.asp?sql=&A1=60&A2=60&Z=28
If the two different isomers of Co-60 produce two different isomers of
Ni-60, I have not found any data to support this. I also find no data
to deny the possibility that the same isomer of Ni-60 can be produced
by two different decay paths from two different Co-60 isomers.
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
- Next message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: This just in: Faith-based Science"
- Maybe in reply to: Y.Porat: "Re: Isotope decay chains"
- Next in thread: Y.Porat: "Re: Isotope decay chains"
- Reply: Y.Porat: "Re: Isotope decay chains"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|