Re: Isotope decay chains
From: Y.Porat (maporat_at_012.net.il)
Date: 02/10/05
- Next message: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Nick: "Re: Operation Crackpot Patrol"
- In reply to: Michael Moroney: "Re: Isotope decay chains"
- Next in thread: Nick: "Re: Isotope decay chains"
- Reply: Nick: "Re: Isotope decay chains"
- Reply: Michael Moroney: "Re: Isotope decay chains"
- Reply: mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu: "Re: Isotope decay chains"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 9 Feb 2005 22:32:07 -0800
Michael Moroney wrote:
> "Angelo" <patrik56@libero.it> writes:
>
> >> > Please notice that I said ''in a decay chain ...'', not
> >> > ''in that decay chain ...'', so I was speaking in general,
> >> > and not about the possible (or impossible) decay chain
> >> > that ends with 197Pt ----> 197Au
> >> ok
>
> >Yes, but what about if that decay chain existed?
> >I mean, suppose for a moment, a chain of 20-30
> >steps, including 197Pt as the penultimate step:
> >the mere fact that 197Pt is so short lived is totally
> >irrelevant. If this point cannot be excluded, how
> >can you conclude that 197Pt can't be 'the mother
> >of Gold'?
>
> A perfect example of this is Po-212. It has a half-life of only
299nS,
> but it is the penultimate member of the Thorium-lead decay chain, and
> thus it is constantly being produced, and is the "mother" of Pb-208.
----------------
very nice but you can ask your friend feuerbacher
and he can testify that all those elements that you mentioned above are
a *family* from the nuclear structure point of view!in my model!
--------------
>
> >Honestly, I don't *think* that decay chain could
> >exist, but this is a bit handwavy.
>
> Looking at Nudat, the only thing I can see that could decay into
Pt-197
> is Ir-197 which beta decays into Pt-197.
-----------
just a preemptive remark to Mike:
i am sure that the only motivation that drives you into this thread
is to hepl me .......... (:-)
again very nice
yet i sayed nothing aginst such posibility
i sayed that Pt cannot become Gold (the real gold only may be
an 'imposter' of Gold
---------------
Nothing I can see decays into
> Ir-197. Hg-201 could theoretically alpha decay into Pt-197,
theorethically ??? acording to whose theory?
now we are not dealing with data that is 'tentative'
we are looking for concteet expermentally verified data
got it ???
we are loaded with tentative speculations that lead us
just to confusion. and no realadvance.
---------------
but it is
> stable. Some theorize that many of the very heavy "stable" isotopes
> are alpha decayers with extremely long half-lives.
--------
that is as well not news to me
i can even explain it with mu model and tell whichj once
have a better chance to alpha decay
it is in thise cases of which there is a single alpha particle
'dangling' catileverly at trhe edge (pole) of the nuc.
most of alpha particles in the inner structure are
'locked in the very srtong 'rectangula pipe' in which each of them
(if you have some 3d immagination) are connected with much more than
just one connection
the a;pha if you done mind is a tetraheder with 4 free edges
and here again the longish shpae of the nucleid works much better
than a 'sphere' you get sory of a 3d cross.
(acording to feuerbachers undestandings
'there is no such animal' with a very dsitinct structure
'acording to the HUP !! and he is an expert of using that
principle...._)
---------------
Bi-209, for example.
> Pt-190 is another. If this is true for Hg-201, there is your (short)
> decay chain right there, and it would be one that exists naturally
since
> Hg-201 is 13.18% of natural mercury. Hg-201(a)->Pt-197(B-)->Au-197.
> Big if, however.
--------------
Mike you have a very creative immagination
but my emphasis is on ..... *immagination* got it ?
btw is it reasonable that Hg will turn to be Pt
bypassing Au and only after becoming Pt will go back to Au???
acording to me Hg cannot transform to Pt!
just ask your common friend Feuerbacher
whether acording to my model
there is any tangible difernce between the skeleton of Pt
and Au
and a second question to him :
if that difference exists between Hg and Gold ?
if he does not ansew that will be an answer as well!.....
it will be another prove that he is a personal enemy of mine.
>
> --
> -Mike
thank you mike for your efforts.(to help me )
all the best
Y.Porat
- Next message: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Nick: "Re: Operation Crackpot Patrol"
- In reply to: Michael Moroney: "Re: Isotope decay chains"
- Next in thread: Nick: "Re: Isotope decay chains"
- Reply: Nick: "Re: Isotope decay chains"
- Reply: Michael Moroney: "Re: Isotope decay chains"
- Reply: mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu: "Re: Isotope decay chains"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|