Re: Men on the moon?
From: tj Frazir (GravityPhysics_at_webtv.net)
Date: 02/10/05
- Next message: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: GPS vs. Source Dependency"
- Previous message: kenseto: "Re: Some Contradictory Claims in SR:"
- In reply to: Richard Herring: "Re: Men on the moon?"
- Next in thread: Mark Fergerson: "Re: Men on the moon?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:44:21 -0500
Nasa thinks more gravity is stronger gravity .
Its not. Its the same gravity just smaller.
The same atoms as if the moon is a pice of the earth.
A big magnet flys up at a plate at the same speed any smaller pice of
it will.
1/6 of a magnet wount fly up at the plate at 1/6 the speed.
Besides the math gravity is the gain in mass
pushing the wieght.
The moon gains 1/6 the mass << FACT but pushes 1/6 the wieght.
The gain is perportional to the wieght.
Evry atom will fall down the 90 * pit angle of the energy sloe of
gravity at the same rate because F is the gain in mass and peroprtional
to evry atoms F pushing its wieght.
Nasa fucked up .
Nasa will just say its the Gov that made theem do it. The gov will
say it was an inside job and they didnt know.
They know not one thing more about gravity than they did then.
They didnt do enouph math to find out.
Thier idias about gravity went no farther than thier math. And nasa
dont have a clue how gravity works and are not that bright to let the
popular vote make evryone think the ffall speed is 1/6.
6 pounds is not falling slower it 1 pound falling.
1 pound and 6 pounds fall side by side.
even if its the same rock .
- Next message: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: GPS vs. Source Dependency"
- Previous message: kenseto: "Re: Some Contradictory Claims in SR:"
- In reply to: Richard Herring: "Re: Men on the moon?"
- Next in thread: Mark Fergerson: "Re: Men on the moon?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]