Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong
guskz_at_hotmail.com
Date: 02/10/05
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Archimedes Plutonium: "Does Mathematics have a concept of Consistency or only one of Default???"
- In reply to: Jesse Mazer: "Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong"
- Next in thread: glbrad01: "Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 10 Feb 2005 12:54:43 -0800
Ok well I moved the computations to another posting in three small
parts beginning with Part1.
Feel free to plug in your input if the twins timing is incorrect?
PS I used ideal values such as I didn't use gamma in order not to play
with abnormal numbers.
So if V is incorrect based on distance, time computations it's only to
keep things simplistic without interfering on the general logic.
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Archimedes Plutonium: "Does Mathematics have a concept of Consistency or only one of Default???"
- In reply to: Jesse Mazer: "Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong"
- Next in thread: glbrad01: "Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
