Re: GPS vs. Source Dependency
From: Henri Wilson (H_at_..(Henri)
Date: 02/10/05
- Next message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Some Contradictory Claims in SR:"
- Previous message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: GPS vs. Source Dependency"
- Next in thread: John Kennaugh: "Re: GPS vs. Source Dependency"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:55:28 GMT
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:00:04 GMT, The Ghost In The Machine
<ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> wrote:
>In sci.physics, H@..(Henri Wilson)
><H@>
> wrote
>on Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:02:06 GMT
><ijfm01d0fh067pumh4jrpp8kaggc8k0gih@4ax.com>:
>>>
>>>> Tom, get it into your head, SPEED IS RELATIVE.
>>>>
>>>> Light moves at c relative to its source. It has no other reference.
>>>
>>>
>>>Light also moves at c relative to whatever is measuring it.
>>>Strange but true.
>>
>> No Ghost. The universal constant 'c' has the same value
>> no matter who measures it. 'c' also happens to be the
>> speed of light wrt its source. It is NOT a measure
>> of OWLS generally.
>
>So why do no scientists assume c' = c+v here?
>Why are accelerators designed to compensate for the SR
>mass gain?
There are more things in heaven and Earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy
Horatio!
What is MASS, Ghost?
>
>>
>>>
>>>Any other, erm, flashes of brilliance? :-)
>>
>> I get about one every hour, Ghost.
>
>Really?
>
>Which star system?
A binary obviously.
>
>>
>>>
>>>[rest snipped]
>>
>>
>> HW.
>> www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>>
HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
- Next message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Some Contradictory Claims in SR:"
- Previous message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: GPS vs. Source Dependency"
- Next in thread: John Kennaugh: "Re: GPS vs. Source Dependency"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
