Re: A colleague possed a question.
From: Gregory L. Hansen (glhansen_at_steel.ucs.indiana.edu)
Date: 02/10/05
- Next message: guskz_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Even simpler demo of Time Dilation Flaw"
- Previous message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu: "Re: A colleague possed a question."
- Next in thread: Edward Green: "Re: A colleague possed a question."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 22:14:22 +0000 (UTC)
In article <V_QOd.18$T4.3812@news.uchicago.edu>,
<mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu> wrote:
>In article <cufu2o$iju$3@rainier.uits.indiana.edu>,
>glhansen@steel.ucs.indiana.edu (Gregory L. Hansen) writes:
>> The probability that 1/sqrt(2) is chosen seems to be identical to the
>>probability that 2 will be chosen, except 1/sqrt(2) might be chosen while
>>2 is not even in the domain. I'm uncomfortable with that.
>
>Well, I'm not fully comfortable with that either, but I don't know of
>any formulation that resolves this issue.
At least it's not just me, then.
-- "Then they placed the ark of the Lord on the cart; along with the box containing the golden mice and the images of the hemorrhoids." -- 1 Samuel 6:11
- Next message: guskz_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Even simpler demo of Time Dilation Flaw"
- Previous message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu: "Re: A colleague possed a question."
- Next in thread: Edward Green: "Re: A colleague possed a question."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
