Re: Inertial-dampening systems
msadkins04_at_yahoo.com
Date: 02/10/05
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Timo Nieminen: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Next in thread: Timo Nieminen: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Reply: Timo Nieminen: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 10 Feb 2005 15:12:07 -0800
Timo Nieminen wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Gregory L. Hansen wrote:
>
> > <msadkins04@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >Then, you dispensed with the epoxy, saying that your
> > >fluid (which doesn't exist, and is both biologically and
mechanically
> > >untenable) works because you can shake an egg in your hand as hard
as
> > >you like without breaking the yolk.
> >
> > I'll bet if you made an effort, you could find literature through
> > scholar.google.com on my oxygenated fluid that doesn't exist and is
both
> > biologically and mechanically untenable. Try searching e.g. on
"liquid
> > ventilation".
>
> I was most impressed when I saw video of such fluid in action (on
some
> popular science show maybe 20 years ago). Big 2 litre beaker of clear
> fluid. Add 1 mouse. Mouse runs around in fluid. Pull mouse out, hang
to
> drain, mouse runs around.
Sigh...I don't suppose it matters that the biological/mechanical
untenability I've been referring to dealt mainly with its proposed
application in the context of the current thread?
.
Mark Adkins
msadkins04@yahoo.com
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Timo Nieminen: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Next in thread: Timo Nieminen: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Reply: Timo Nieminen: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|