Re: Buoyancy on a submerged block on bottom of tank
From: Edward Green (spamspamspam3_at_netzero.com)
Date: 02/11/05
- Next message: Nick: "Non-Radioactive atoms decay in GUT's"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: The formal mathematical disproof of relativity - by Androcles"
- In reply to: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Buoyancy on a submerged block on bottom of tank"
- Next in thread: tj Frazir: "Re: Buoyancy on a submerged block on bottom of tank"
- Reply: tj Frazir: "Re: Buoyancy on a submerged block on bottom of tank"
- Reply: Richard Herring: "Re: Buoyancy on a submerged block on bottom of tank"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 10 Feb 2005 16:10:06 -0800
Gregory L. Hansen wrote:
> Edward's flapper valve is a brilliant example.
Blush.
> The valve floats, except
> when it's closed and the tank is filled the weight of water keeps it
down
> and sealed. The flapper valve itself is a brilliant but seldom
> appreciated peice of engineering-- so much functionality in a single
> peice of rubber with a hinge. It's hard to make things look easy.
Of course, I made it look a little two easy. If the valve were merely
at the bottom of the tank, the dynamic force of water rushing out of
the hole would presumably overwhelm the buoyancy and the valve would
reseat too soon. To prevent this seems to be the function of a barrier
surrounding the outlet, which meters the outflow and allows the valve
to float on the resulting free surface inside the barrier and near the
bottom of the tank.
- Next message: Nick: "Non-Radioactive atoms decay in GUT's"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: The formal mathematical disproof of relativity - by Androcles"
- In reply to: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Buoyancy on a submerged block on bottom of tank"
- Next in thread: tj Frazir: "Re: Buoyancy on a submerged block on bottom of tank"
- Reply: tj Frazir: "Re: Buoyancy on a submerged block on bottom of tank"
- Reply: Richard Herring: "Re: Buoyancy on a submerged block on bottom of tank"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|