Non-Radioactive atoms decay in GUT's
From: Nick (macromitch_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/11/05
- Next message: Edward Green: "Re: scale-free complexity may be wrong: CUNY"
- Previous message: Edward Green: "Re: Buoyancy on a submerged block on bottom of tank"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Non-Radioactive atoms decay in GUT's"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: Non-Radioactive atoms decay in GUT's"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: Non-Radioactive atoms decay in GUT's"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 10 Feb 2005 16:11:21 -0800
In GUT's atoms are said to decay.
What then are the lives of the nonradioactive?
Shouldn't it be the heaviest atoms decaying first?
Going all the way down to hydrogen?
We could test it by looking at the heaviest atoms that are
nonradioactive.
If they decay the fastest we might have a chance to see the phenomenon.
If so, this should be obvious.
Why should I say it?
Mitch Raemsch
- Next message: Edward Green: "Re: scale-free complexity may be wrong: CUNY"
- Previous message: Edward Green: "Re: Buoyancy on a submerged block on bottom of tank"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Non-Radioactive atoms decay in GUT's"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: Non-Radioactive atoms decay in GUT's"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: Non-Radioactive atoms decay in GUT's"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
