Re: scale-free complexity may be wrong: CUNY
From: Edward Green (spamspamspam3_at_netzero.com)
Date: 02/11/05
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: which sides are the perihelion and aphelion?"
- Previous message: Nick: "Non-Radioactive atoms decay in GUT's"
- In reply to: Daryl McCullough: "Re: scale-free complexity may be wrong: CUNY"
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: scale-free complexity may be wrong: CUNY"
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: scale-free complexity may be wrong: CUNY"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 10 Feb 2005 16:12:05 -0800
Daryl McCullough wrote:
> Edward Green says...
> What in the world is your problem, Ed? You follow that link, and
> you immediately see a pointer to
> http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20050129/fob3.asp
> It takes two seconds, and you are complaining?
>
> Your hostile reaction is bizarre.
Guilty as charged.
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: which sides are the perihelion and aphelion?"
- Previous message: Nick: "Non-Radioactive atoms decay in GUT's"
- In reply to: Daryl McCullough: "Re: scale-free complexity may be wrong: CUNY"
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: scale-free complexity may be wrong: CUNY"
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: scale-free complexity may be wrong: CUNY"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
