Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Albert (albertwagner_at_cox.net)
Date: 02/12/05
- Next message: harmony: "hindus plotting to harvest helium3 from moon - habshi, have a ball"
- Previous message: Timo Nieminen: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- In reply to: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:50:53 -0600
Tony Orlow (aeo6) wrote:
<snip>
> Chess is a game, and a mathematical passtime. I am not sure sure it is
> worth talking too much about chess, though it's fun to play and the math
> is interesting. I guess fun is the real world application of that math,
> eh?
The real chessmasters don't do math in order to play chess well.
What makes them great is intuition.
--
"Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the
range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally
impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it."
-- George Orwell as Syme in "1984"
- Next message: harmony: "hindus plotting to harvest helium3 from moon - habshi, have a ball"
- Previous message: Timo Nieminen: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- In reply to: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
