Re: The formal mathematical disproof of relativity - by Androcles
From: Androcles (Androcles_at_)
Date: 02/12/05
- Next message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: mountain man: "Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment"
- In reply to: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: The formal mathematical disproof of relativity - by Androcles"
- Next in thread: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: The formal mathematical disproof of relativity - by Androcles"
- Reply: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: The formal mathematical disproof of relativity - by Androcles"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 01:16:06 GMT
"Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@vianet.on.ca> wrote in message
news:1108166905.485676.143160@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Count Drocles and his Frankenfixics,
> Brundlefly and the spiral of photons
> merges with DNA, I'm writing a script!!
> Ken
So you don't have anything sensible to say then, Tucker?
Thought not.. is it the cocaine or the alcohol?
Androcles
- Next message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: mountain man: "Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment"
- In reply to: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: The formal mathematical disproof of relativity - by Androcles"
- Next in thread: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: The formal mathematical disproof of relativity - by Androcles"
- Reply: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: The formal mathematical disproof of relativity - by Androcles"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|