Re: Why does measuring tape bend one way?
From: Edward Green (spamspamspam3_at_netzero.com)
Date: 02/12/05
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "WATCHING ATOMS MOVE"
- Previous message: tj Frazir: "Re: Buoyancy on a submerged block on bottom of tank"
- In reply to: Ken Muldrew: "Re: Why does measuring tape bend one way?"
- Next in thread: Ken Muldrew: "Re: Why does measuring tape bend one way?"
- Reply: Ken Muldrew: "Re: Why does measuring tape bend one way?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 11 Feb 2005 17:53:08 -0800
Ken Muldrew wrote:
> You may be interested to know that there is a "jam side down"
physical
> law with respect to measuring tapes. Every measurement where you are
> unable to support the tape easily is just far enough to cause
> buckling. There has never been a demonstrated exception to this rule.
Interesting. Then perhaps we can devise a kind of "inertialess drive"
by trying to measure the distance to a nearby object with stiffer and
stiffer tapes, causing the object to recede with zero momentum in the
reference frame. Of course it may be objected that the distance to the
object only exists when we measure it, otherwise presumably having an
imaginary value; in this way the sums of squares and hence RMS distance
is enabled to remain constant while the series of lower bounds given by
the buckling lengths of the unsupported tapes grows without bound,
proving that the object is receding on a right circularly polarized
light cone, rolling on the herpolhode. By transforming in the complex
momentum plane and continuing to roll right round the pole, we can see
that the apparent velocity actually lies on a non-positive
infinitesimal casual generator, which is equivalent to measurements of
a second series of tape measures moving _backwards_ in time. In fact,
it may be considered that there is only a single tape measure with many
branches, so the causality really works out OK, although at first
glance it may seem paradoxical.
This simple point trips up many tyros, and causes a lot of unnecessary
argument, though it's hard to imagine how anybody could be confused
once you see the trick!
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "WATCHING ATOMS MOVE"
- Previous message: tj Frazir: "Re: Buoyancy on a submerged block on bottom of tank"
- In reply to: Ken Muldrew: "Re: Why does measuring tape bend one way?"
- Next in thread: Ken Muldrew: "Re: Why does measuring tape bend one way?"
- Reply: Ken Muldrew: "Re: Why does measuring tape bend one way?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
