Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Albert (albertwagner_at_cox.net)
Date: 02/12/05
- Next message: Rob Bruce: "Question about falling bodies"
- Previous message: Sam Wormley: "WATCHING ATOMS MOVE"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: tj Frazir: "Re: Epi snip sam said"
- Reply: tj Frazir: "Re: Epi snip sam said"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 20:53:55 -0600
robert j. kolker wrote:
>
>
> Tony Orlow (aeo6) wrote:
>
>>
>> Maybe you guys have sucky intuition because you're so steeped in
>> formalisms.
>
>
> I have wonderful intuition. But half the time it is wrong.
And then your non-intuition kicks in. Non-mathematicians
typically lack non-intuition and that is their problem.
Intuition only works half the time.
--
"Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the
range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally
impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it."
-- George Orwell as Syme in "1984"
- Next message: Rob Bruce: "Question about falling bodies"
- Previous message: Sam Wormley: "WATCHING ATOMS MOVE"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: tj Frazir: "Re: Epi snip sam said"
- Reply: tj Frazir: "Re: Epi snip sam said"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
