Re: Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?
From: Dirk Van de moortel (dirkvandemoortel_at_ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com)
Date: 02/12/05
- Next message: kenseto: "Re: Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?"
- Previous message: Daryl McCullough: "Re: The formal mathematical disproof of relativity - by Androcles"
- In reply to: kenseto: "Re: Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:36:50 GMT
"kenseto" <kenseto@erinet.com> wrote in message news:KBpPd.704$pY.638@fe2.columbus.rr.com...
>
> "Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote in message
> news:VLjPd.89920$K7.42584@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> >
> > "A.S." <arnoldschrod68@go.com> wrote in message
> > news:1108196351.363959.109670@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > >
> > >
> > > Anyone familiar with Ken Seto model of Absolute Motion
> > > in the Aether. He uses it to explain the Double Slit
> > > experiments, Photoelectric experiments, and Comptons
> > > experiments as shown in the following site:
> > >
> > > http://my.erinet.com/~kenseto/pastexperiments.htm
> > >
> > > When he described absolute motion in the Aether. Does
> > > he mean we are all moving at the Aether nonstop?? What
> > > made us move at all?? This is a weird Aether concept.
> > >
> > > For those who have completely debunked the model of
> > > Ken Seto. Can you mention one experiment or principle
> > > that disprove his Absolute Motion principles that
> > > tried to replace the theories of Einstein??
> > >
> > > For those not familiar with Ken Seto. The following
> > > is his paper where he claimed it may be the 21th
> > > century greatest scientific achivement.
> > >
> > > http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/Links/Papers/Seto.pdf
> > >
> > > Is Ken Seto the next Einstein or he is simply a madman?
> > >
> > > A.S.
> > Einstein was a brillian huckster, the greatest there ever was.
> > Seto is merely psychotic. He claims the (so-called) aether
> > operates at a right angle to MMX. Seto doesn't fool anyone
> > the way Einstein can.
>
> You are an idiot. I claimed no such thing. I claimed that the MMX null
> result can be explained if the MMX apparatus is moving vertically wrt the
> defined horizontal light rays. In order for the MMX to detect absolute
> motion the plane of the light ray must be oriented in the same direction of
> absolute motion of the apparatus.
> Moron.
To A.S.
You see, Ken Seto has persoanlly invented
The Ken Seto Law of Isotropy of Verticality:
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/IsoVert.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Vertical2.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/MMXVertical.html
Extremely Peer Reviewed in the World Famous Journal
Galilean Electrodynamics.
He is a genius!
Dirk Vdm
- Next message: kenseto: "Re: Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?"
- Previous message: Daryl McCullough: "Re: The formal mathematical disproof of relativity - by Androcles"
- In reply to: kenseto: "Re: Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|