Re: Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?

From: kenseto (kenseto_at_erinet.com)
Date: 02/12/05 

Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:28:28 GMT

"Bjoern Feuerbacher" <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message
news:culer6$dl2$3@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de...
> A.S. wrote:
> >
> > Anyone familiar with Ken Seto model of Absolute Motion
> > in the Aether. He uses it to explain the Double Slit
> > experiments, Photoelectric experiments, and Comptons
> > experiments as shown in the following site:
> >
> > http://my.erinet.com/~kenseto/pastexperiments.htm
>
> He *claims* to explain these experiments. But actually,
> he only presents a lot of empty rhetoric and handwavings
> - no actual (quantitative) explanations.

No empty rhetoric it provides a logical explanation of these experiments
based on the Model Mechanical model of our universe.
>
>
> > When he described absolute motion in the Aether. Does
> > he mean we are all moving at the Aether nonstop?? What
> > made us move at all?? This is a weird Aether concept.
> >
> > For those who have completely debunked the model of
> > Ken Seto. Can you mention one experiment or principle
> > that disprove his Absolute Motion principles that
> > tried to replace the theories of Einstein??
>
> Michelson-Morley.

The MMX null result agrees with my analysis of the experiment..
>
> Seto's claim that this experiment showed a null result
> because "the apparatus moves vertically with respect
> to the light rays" is complete utter meaningless nonsense.

Hand waving is not an argument.
If the MMX apparatus is oriented with the plane of the light rays in the
vertical direction then a non-null result will be observed. What this mean
is that the design of the MMX is not capable of detecting absolute motion
and that the null result is NOT because there is no absolute motion.
>
>
> > For those not familiar with Ken Seto. The following
> > is his paper where he claimed it may be the 21th
> > century greatest scientific achivement.
> >
> > http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/Links/Papers/Seto.pdf
>
> Like most crackpots, he is really full of himself.

ROTFLOL....so you think that calling me a crackpot is debunking my theory??
>
>
> > Is Ken Seto the next Einstein or he is simply a madman?
>
> Neither nor. Simply seriously deluded, and overestimating
> his own intellect.

Do the experiment outlined in the following link will determine whether I am
overestimating my intellect. Your hand-waving of dismissing my theory is a
sign of a coward.
http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/Links/Papers/Seto.pdf

Ken Seto

Relevant Pages

  • Re: No point in doing this to western hos
    ... Call it a fashion accessory, ... the phone lines to buy chastity belts from Home Shopping ... of women supporting abortion, while mysogynist ... it isn't a sacrament now only because of the ...
    (soc.men)
  • Parallels: Come si recuperano i dati?
    ... Mio padre ha Parallels installato con una licenza di Windows ... Da ieri Windows non funziona più... ...
    (it.comp.macintosh)
  • Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
    ... In sci.physics.relativity, Ken Seto ... >> Aether, a rigid medium that pervaded all of space. ... > The null result of the MMX does not mean that the ether doesn't exist. ... > the MMX is not capable of detecting absolute motion. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?
    ... Anyone familiar with Ken Seto model of Absolute Motion ... When he described absolute motion in the Aether. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: The postulates of IRT
    ... Furthermore the experiment is designed to detect absolute motion. ... | luminferous aether predictors were expecting. ... But MMX is ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast