McCullough Misses the Main Point
From: Androcles (Androcles_at_)
Date: 02/13/05
- Next message: JM Albuquerque: "Re: looking for evidence of the supernatural"
- Previous message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Question about falling bodies"
- In reply to: Daryl McCullough: "Androcles Misses the Main Point"
- Next in thread: Daryl McCullough: "Re: McCullough Misses the Main Point"
- Reply: Daryl McCullough: "Re: McCullough Misses the Main Point"
- Reply: Daryl McCullough: "Androcles asks for Help"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 02:04:42 GMT
"Daryl McCullough" <stevendaryl3016@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:culkve02krd@drn.newsguy.com...
> Androcles says...
>
>>> As I said, Einstein assumes that 1 and 2 are both c:
>>
>>No he doesn't. NOWHERE can you find that in his paper
>
> That is the most bizarre claim I've ever heard, Androcles.
> http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
>
> We will raise this conjecture (the purport of which will
> hereafter be called the ``Principle of Relativity'') to
> the status of a postulate, and also introduce another
> postulate, which is only apparently irreconcilable with
> the former, namely, that light is always propagated in
> empty space with a definite velocity c which is independent
> of the state of motion of the emitting body.
>
> He is clearly saying that light has constant speed c.
Yep, the speed of mosquitoes, c, is 5 fps in all frames of reference.
Proof:
(c+v)/(1+ v/c) = c,
so
(5+1) / (1+ 1/5) = 5
Clearly.
>
> Later he writes:
>
> We now have to prove that any ray of light, measured in the
> moving system, is propagated with the velocity c, if, as we
> have assumed, this is the case in the stationary system
Ah... well, the word to look at is "prove".
>
> Somehow you missed the fact that Einstein was assuming that
> light propagates at speed c in both frames?
Funny, he also said "the velocity of light in our theory plays the
part, physically, of an infinitely great velocity"
AND
"But the ray moves relatively to the initial point of k, when measured
in the stationary system, with the velocity c-v",
so I fail to see any proof, just you selecting what you want to back up
your personal theory of relativity.
> After years of
> arguing about relativity, you missed this, most important
> fact about Einstein's theory?
The most important FACT is
"We now have to PROVE that any ray of light, measured in the
moving system, is propagated with the velocity c", MCullough,
and I gave PROOF that mosquitoes always fly in all brains of inertial
reference ( which is yours) with a definite velocity 5 fps which is
independent of the state of motion of Sam.
>
> Androcles, go take a course.
I already did. S100, M100, M201, M202, TM251, TS282, SM351.....
> Find a junior college that teaches
> an introductory course in relativity.
Nah... I prefer math, not imbecile.
> I'm sure it's not too expensive.
What waste good money I could spend on beer instead?
You are not being rational, psychotic McCullough.
Androcles.
- Next message: JM Albuquerque: "Re: looking for evidence of the supernatural"
- Previous message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Question about falling bodies"
- In reply to: Daryl McCullough: "Androcles Misses the Main Point"
- Next in thread: Daryl McCullough: "Re: McCullough Misses the Main Point"
- Reply: Daryl McCullough: "Re: McCullough Misses the Main Point"
- Reply: Daryl McCullough: "Androcles asks for Help"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
