Re: Men on the moon?

From: tj Frazir (GravityPhysics_at_webtv.net)
Date: 02/13/05 

Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:48:08 -0500

They wount do that either.
A matter of fact . The side thruster ( laderal thruster ) image I tryed
to post is not gone.
 After our ladral thuster post started the image was yanked off the
net.
 The faimouse view out the window when the ( laderal thusrer fired.
  Luna 17 toulk the images nasa used.
Nasa never got a probe down ,,allways the same stupid mistake.
 Luna 17 spent 11 months roaming te aria and sent back 22000 images.
  22000 images ..rockes evrywhere it looks like mars. But not one
fucking sand dune.
  erosion causes sand impacts dont and sand and rocks land at the same
time .
 More of a rock pile and no sand dunes are just not posible on the
moon.
  What bugs me is the lack of rock tracks.
 Rocks land at angles and rip lines in the surface. Nasa never got
near the moon and dont know about the lines drawn by rocks on the moon.
There should be a trench behind evry other rock .
  The rock rolled over it left a print.
Evry rock print evry rock made.
 But fucking nasa is driving around in a sand dune smoother than a
babes ass.
  Then theres one more problem nasa has .
Russia has 22000 images per probe .
 RUSSIA has done 10,000 things on the moon for 11 months.
  Russia landed because we knew how fast to land .
  Luna 17 lander data speed records and usa speed record contridics
nasa.
  Thats why I dont have the same fall rate as nasa . But I have 22000
images of where nasa is not.
 LOOK ..Luna went up and looked for 11 months.
  Besides ,,the first time nasa used the side thruster wile landing on
the moon they would have fallen on thier face.
 Besides landing with the methods they sad they used wount work.