Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)
From: Paul Holbach (paulholbachSPAMBAN_at_freenet.de)
Date: 02/14/05
- Next message: tj Frazir: "Re: re:Breaking News! UFO Sighted over Washington,DC!"
- Previous message: Paul Holbach: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- In reply to: Lester Zick: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 13 Feb 2005 18:06:26 -0800
> Lester Zick wrote:
> > "robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> wrote:
> > > Paul Holbach wrote:
> > > Existence is an essential (logical) property of everything (=
> > > everything existent), that is, nothing can cease to exist without
> > > ceasing to exist.
> > Do unicorns exist? Yes or no? Do five sided triangles exist?
> > Yes or No.
> Do circular definitions exist? Apparently.
???
There occurs no circular definition in what I´ve said.
#PH
- Next message: tj Frazir: "Re: re:Breaking News! UFO Sighted over Washington,DC!"
- Previous message: Paul Holbach: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- In reply to: Lester Zick: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]