Re: re:Men on the moon?
From: tj Frazir (GravityPhysics_at_webtv.net)
Date: 02/14/05
- Next message: Y.Porat: "Re: WATCHING ATOMS MOVE"
- Previous message: Morituri-|-Max: "Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or Power Supply?"
- In reply to: tj Frazir: "Re: re:Men on the moon?"
- Next in thread: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: re:Men on the moon?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:35:44 -0500
Imagine 32 foot fall in 6 seconds.
1/6 the wieght is falling.
the wieght is not falling 1/6 the speed.
1/6 the distance is the orbit.
But a 5 foot fall 1.2 seconds was a timming error. 36 feet in 6
seconds is fucking nutz.
I saw sand at the wheels do 1 G speed 32 feet sec.
You should slow the tape so evrything falls the speed nasa said it
would.
I saw him fall . didnt you see him fall ?
it should have taken a second for him to fall over. He fell over
like he wieghed 70 pounds on earth with the pack on.
besides the fact a laderal thruster is putting your hand against the
dock instead of on top of the dock so the board they stood on slid out
from under them and nasa fell on thier faces.
- Next message: Y.Porat: "Re: WATCHING ATOMS MOVE"
- Previous message: Morituri-|-Max: "Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or Power Supply?"
- In reply to: tj Frazir: "Re: re:Men on the moon?"
- Next in thread: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: re:Men on the moon?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]