Re: New challenge to Einstein from experiment?
From: Dirk Van de moortel (dirkvandemoortel_at_ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com)
Date: 02/14/05
- Next message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Previous message: la ver: "Happy Valentine's Day"
- In reply to: Jim Greenfield: "Re: New challenge to Einstein from experiment?"
- Next in thread: jgreen_at_seol.net.au: "Re: New challenge to Einstein from experiment?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:07:09 +0100
"Jim Greenfield" <jgreen@seol.net.au> wrote in message news:e7b5cc5d.0502131743.3195c9d@posting.google.com...
> "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<ejbPd.9460$Fi6.558138@phobos.telenet-ops.be>...
> > "Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote in message news:9LaPd.87849$K7.67388@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> > >
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > >
> > > My statement is clear enough.
> > > How anyone could claim
> > > [ something, in this case it happens to be V = (u+v)/ ( 1 + uv/c^2)]
> > > is baffling to say the least.
> >
> > Androcles is one of those top-class experimentalists who
> > has done an experiment where a velocity of 1 m/s was
> > combined with a velocity of 1 m/s and it gave exactly
> > 2.00000000000000000 m/s as opposed to the
> > 1.99999999999999998 m/s that is predicted by the theory.
> > Together with Jim Greenfield, Vertner Vergon, John
> > Polasek, and Mike (aka Bill Smith aka Undeniable aka
> > Eleatis) he will be nominated for the Nobel-prize next
> > year.
> >
> > Dirk Vdm
>
> I know that you are unable/willing to answer this,
> but what IS the value of c^2 when c is 300,000 km/sec (for
> convienience)
> If YOU can arrive at a result other than 90,000,000,000 km/sec, the
> Prize is yours, for pointing out that every calculation ever made by
> squaring a number, is incorrect!
If you say something as silly as this, make sure it's not
silly for more than one reason :-)
In case you are trying to outclass Androcles, forget it.
>
> ....and note DV _carefully_ says "predicted by the theory" (not
> "measured")
And here you do it again with even less words:
(1) Theories don't measure.
(2) Newtoniam mechanics "predicts" that when we let go
of Jim Greenfield at the top of a high tower, he will be
fall down and cover a few square meters of pavement.
Will Jim Greenfield volunteer to perform the actual
measurement? Perhaps the Prize can be yours:
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PrizeYours.html
Dirk Vdm
- Next message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Previous message: la ver: "Happy Valentine's Day"
- In reply to: Jim Greenfield: "Re: New challenge to Einstein from experiment?"
- Next in thread: jgreen_at_seol.net.au: "Re: New challenge to Einstein from experiment?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|