Re: Androcles asks for Help
From: Daryl McCullough (stevendaryl3016_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/14/05
- Next message: Richard Herring: "Re: Question about reflection & refraction?"
- Previous message: Dorian West: "Re: Breaking News! UFO Sighted over Washington,DC!"
- In reply to: Androcles: "Re: Androcles asks for Help"
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: Androcles asks for Help"
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: Androcles asks for Help"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 14 Feb 2005 03:59:44 -0800
Androcles says...
>Jesse, you should try understand that McCullough isn't arguing in good
>faith
I'm not arguing at all---I'm trying to explain.
>The Lorentz transformation came from somewhere, it didn't just magically
>appear out of thin air.
I gave you a derivation, and you ignored it.
>and that comes from the mosquito example, so we cannot put the
>Lorentz equations into the mosquito example to derive the Lorentz
>equations, which the idiot McCullough tried to do.
I never tried to use the mosquito example to derive the Lorentz
transformations. It was just used to derive the mathematical
result
If objects A and B are travelling at speed v in a straight line,
and a signal travels from one to the other and back at speed c,
then the round trip time will be 2cL/(c^2 - v^2).
This is a mathematical result which is independent of whether one
assumes Galilean relativity or Einstein's relativity.
>So what I want to know is why Einstein thinks (16 + 4)/2 = 16
Since Einstein doesn't think that, and that doesn't follow from
anything said by Einstein, your question is loony.
-- Daryl McCullough Ithaca, NY
- Next message: Richard Herring: "Re: Question about reflection & refraction?"
- Previous message: Dorian West: "Re: Breaking News! UFO Sighted over Washington,DC!"
- In reply to: Androcles: "Re: Androcles asks for Help"
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: Androcles asks for Help"
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: Androcles asks for Help"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|