Re: Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?
From: kenseto (kenseto_at_erinet.com)
Date: 02/14/05
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- Previous message: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: tj Frazir: "Re: Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?"
- Next in thread: tj Frazir: "Re: Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?"
- Reply: tj Frazir: "Re: Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:07:37 GMT
"tj Frazir" <GravityPhysics@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:15631-420FFBE7-75@storefull-3216.bay.webtv.net...
> Its ienstiens dark energy ya dip***.
> I think ken seto is a loon.
> As the universe expands a low forms around mass and up is a gain in
> energy.
> matter in motion takes up mmore space per time unit.
> Dark ENERGY 99.7 % of the universe.
>
> ken soto ,,get with the program .
> iether aither what ever has been updated by ienstien and is called DARK
> ENERGY.
> either i for idiots that cant read
idiot....learn how to spell.
>
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- Previous message: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: tj Frazir: "Re: Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?"
- Next in thread: tj Frazir: "Re: Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?"
- Reply: tj Frazir: "Re: Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]