Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 02/14/05
- Next message: Y.Porat: "Re: New Cubic Atomic Model explains electron energy levels and bonding"
- Previous message: ##minty: "Re: Liberals = Anti-Christ/Anar-Chist SCUM!"
- In reply to: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:26:56 -0500
Tony Orlow (aeo6) wrote:
>
> I agree. Mind is the function of brain. I won't try to defend this
> position, but I also hold open the possibility that mind may exist
> independent of a brain, though it doesn't make sense to me at this time.
If not a brain, then some other physical system. But disembodied mind is
a nonsensical notion.
Bob Kolker
- Next message: Y.Porat: "Re: New Cubic Atomic Model explains electron energy levels and bonding"
- Previous message: ##minty: "Re: Liberals = Anti-Christ/Anar-Chist SCUM!"
- In reply to: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|